This chapter explores the socio-psychological dynamics of stereotyping in early modern England. It begins with some broader conceptual and methodological questions, relating to the nature of our sources and how they can be interpreted. It considers the various ways in which national and religious stereotypes became embedded in early modern English society, the functions they served and how they were reproduced and re-cast over time, reflecting on the emotional versus the intellectual dimensions of prejudice, the role of humour in stereotyping and the construction of ‘false composites’. It concludes by examining how seventeenth-century controversialists and polemicists sought to mobilise and manipulate popular stereotypes and prejudices for partisan ends, focusing in particular on Scotophobia, anti-puritanism and anti-popery. These phobias were not straightforward prejudices but instead multivalent and complex cultural phenomena. They were rarely unambiguous, and were frequently contested, capable of being used for radically different ideological purposes at different times and even for competing ideological purposes at the same time.
Saudi Arabia and Iran: The struggle to shape the Middle East provides a detailed exploration of the rivalry between Riyadh and Tehran across the Middle East. As one of the most compelling rivalries in international politics, the Saudi–Iranian competition for regional influence has impacted on a number of different locales. After the onset of the Arab Uprisings and the fragmentation of regime–society relations, communal relations have continued to degenerate, as societal actors retreat into sub-state identities, whilst difference becomes increasingly violent, spilling out beyond state borders. The power of religion – and the trans-state nature of religious linkages – thus provides the means for actors, such as Saudi Arabia and Iran, to exert influence over a number of groups across the region. Given these issues, the contributions to this volume, and the collection as a whole, have two main aims: firstly, to explore the nature of the rivalry between Saudi Arabia and Iran within the contemporary Middle East; and secondly, to consider the impact of this rivalry upon regional and domestic politics across the Middle East. This volume examines how the rivalry is perceived in both Saudi Arabia and Iran, as well as in the contestation over religious legitimacy. It also offers in-depth explorations of the impact of this rivalry upon five regional states: Iraq, Syria, Bahrain, Lebanon and Yemen, all sites of contestation between Riyadh and Tehran, albeit in different guises. In doing so, it highlights how the rivalry is shaped by the contingencies of time and space.
Early modern London consumed a vast amount of mineral coal, which created a uniquely dirty, smoky, urban atmosphere. The phrase ‘sin and sea coal’, used in plays, essays and private letters, came to stand for this physical environment and its moral meaning, but in ways that were complex and variable. By about 1700 it represented the medical and moral dangers of the urban environment, but also inhabitants’ self-aware choices to endure or even to enjoy those dangers. Such uses show how perceptions of the city, rather than shifting from negative to positive, could remain unresolved across the early modern period. It was a metaphor for urban life that could be either serious or playful, earnest or mocking, moralising or libertine. London as smoky and sinful was a stereotype, but one that did not contribute to increasing social tension or political division, nor cause people to fight their neighbours or kill their enemies. Instead, it contributed to a nagging and persistent sense that urban growth and economic improvement had regrettable but perhaps inevitable costs, environmental as well as social and moral.
Early modern stereotypes are often studied as evidence of popular belief, something mired with prejudices and commonly held assumptions. This volume of essays goes beyond this approach, and explores practices of stereotyping as contested processes. To do so the volume draws on recent works on social psychology and sociology. The volume thereby brings together early modern case studies, and explores how stereotypes and their mobilisation shaped various negotiations of power, in spheres of life such as politics, religion, everyday life and knowledge production. The volume highlights early modern men’s and women’s remarkable creativity and agency: godly reformers used the ‘puritan’ stereotype to understand popular aversion to religious discipline; Ben Jonson developed the characters of the puritan and the projector in ways that helped diffuse anxieties about fundamental problems in early modern church and state; playful allusions to London’s ‘sin and sea coal’ permitted a knowing acceptance of urban growth and its moral and environmental costs; Tory polemics accused of ‘popery’ returned the same accusations to Whig Protestants; humanists projected related Christian stereotypes outwards to make sense of Islam and Hinduism in the age of Enlightenment. Case studies collectively point to a paradox: stereotyping was so pervasive and foundational to social life and yet so liable to escalation that collective engagements with it often ended up perpetuating the very processes of stereotyping. By highlighting these dialectics of stereotyping, the volume invites readers to make fresh connections between the early modern past and the present without being anachronistic.
A neoclassical realist perspective of Saudi foreign policy towards Iran in the post-2011 Middle East
This chapter employs a neoclassical realist approach to unravel the dynamics of Saudi-heightened tensions with Iran. It argues that Saudi foreign policy is at the intersection of international, regional and domestic conditions. Rising Saudi tensions with Iran are the result of structural conditions, exemplified in the multipolarity of the regional structure and the decline of US hegemonic control of the region. These structural conditions were compounded with the rise of a nascent top-down Saudi nationalism presenting the Kingdom as destined to play a leading role in rolling back Iranian expansion in the Arab world. Firstly, it presents the tenets of neoclassical realism. It then sets out the structural conditions that Saudi elites were facing during the decade following the 2011 uprisings. Thirdly, the chapter examines the rise of Saudi nationalism at the domestic level, which shaped Saudi elites’ responses to the structural conditions leading to tensions and escalation in its rivalry with Iran.
Francophobia and francophilia in Samuel Pepys’s Diary
Stereotyping cannot be adequately understood in terms either of escalation or containment. Another aspect worth critical attention is the co-existence within society and within one individual of contradictory stereotypes – what social psychologists call cognitive polyphasia. This chapter explores this aspect of stereotyping by diving into the world of metropolitan sociability and cultural distinction, as recorded in copious diaries by one wealthy individual: Samuel Pepys. Pepys’s diaries recorded all things French, music, language, clothing and people. These were mentioned far more frequently than the Dutch, Scottish and other nationalities. This chapter demonstrates that Frenchness carried greater ambiguity than hitherto appreciated. While French Catholicism was linked with absolutism and arbitrary government (as discussed by both Harris and Morton), Frenchness was also associated in Pepys’s world with prestige, refined taste and distinction. It was possible for individuals like Pepys to embrace contradictory stereotypes, invoking different aspects of them depending on context. This understanding of dispositions towards French things, people and France itself complicates our understanding of ‘public opinion’ in this period, too often cast as a shift from anti-Dutch to anti-French positions. Transnational interactions then – as now – often gave prompted repulsion and ethnocentrism as well as emulation of the 'others'.
Using political and critical theory, this article identifies in James Baldwin a
model for citizenship unique to the Black artist who assumed the dual
responsibilities of art practice and political activism. I engage with
Baldwin’s fiction and his writing about other Black artists working in
theater, film, dance, and music during the period of the civil rights movement.
Across his career, Baldwin’s prevailing view was that, because of their
history, Black artists have the singular, and indeed superlative, capacity to
make art as praxis. Baldwin explains that the craft of the Black artist depends
upon representing truths, rather than fantasies, about their experience, so that
they are at once artists pursuing freedom and citizens pursuing
justice. This article pays particular attention to the tension between living a
public, political life and the need for privacy to create art, and ultimately
the toll this takes on the citizen artist. Baldwin demonstrates how the
community of mutual support he finds among Black artists aids in their survival.
In his writings on Sidney Poitier and Lorraine Hansberry, his friendships with
Beauford Delaney and Josephine Baker, as well as his reviews of music and
literature, Baldwin assembles a collective he refers to as “I and my
This review of the James Baldwin symposium at Virginia State University weighs
the insights presented by a number of Black and white scholars, only a few of
whom might be considered deeply informed about his life and legacy. Even so, the
emerging thinkers provide a wealth of new and interesting perspectives on
Baldwin, and the event was highlighted by Molefi Kete Asante’s critical
lecture. His comments are a veritable call to arms, an invitation to Baldwin
devotees to contend with his conclusions, a process which this article will
Justin A. Joyce introduces the eighth volume of James Baldwin
Review with a discussion of the US Supreme Court, the misdirected
uproar over Critical Race Theory, a survey of canonical dystopian novels, and
the symbolism of masking during COVID-19.