Search results
insignia. As the company explains, this eagle with batwings behind it was chosen to symbolise strength, readiness, and superiority. 6 Another US company, which was founded by an American Jew who joined the IDF and served in a special combat unit, portrays a shooter with a handgun, above him a text in Hebrew which says ‘Counter Terror School’. 7 Beneath the shooting figure we find the English translation. A third US company also
not intervene militarily on behalf of the Jews of Russia or the Armenians in the Ottoman Empire? 6 And why did the US intervene only in Cuba and not in, say, oppressive regimes of South America, which instead it chose to support? 7 But as even Franck and Rodley are prepared to accept, the Greek case and some others against the Ottoman Empire ‘are probably not to be dismissed as bogus. At least they struck a responsive chord in Western European and Russian public
security practices, and the protection of its regime boundaries. In terms of regime boundaries, the ‘ascent’ ( aliyah ) of Jews from the diaspora to ‘Eretz Israel’ (the land of Israel) was at the core of the Zionist project according to which ‘similar progression of immigration and colonization was the precondition for the coming into existence of the State of Israel in 1948’ (Shafir 1984 : 803). The Law
minimum proposal. The first suggested the creation of a large independent Bulgaria with an extended outlet to the Aegean Sea, including Salonica (where a large segment of the population were Sephardic Jews) as well as major gains for Serbia, Montenegro and Greece. The minimum plan was accepted, which limited the gains to Montenegro and the Bulgarians (the climate was not favourable to Serbia). Independence for Bulgaria, including Salonica, were not accepted, but a large
–32. Marrus, M. R. and R. O. Paxton, 1995. Vichy France and the Jews , Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Simonin, A., 2008. Le Déshonneur dans la République: Une histoire de l’Indignité 1791–1958 [Dishonor in the Republic: A History of Indignity 1791–1958] , Paris: Grasset. Tuman, J. S., 2010. Communicating Terror: The Rhetorical Dimensions of Terrorism
against the general will in our fatherland’. 160 He called for intervention on behalf of all ‘Ottoman nations’ (including the Ottoman Greeks, the Ottoman Armenians and the Ottoman Jews). 161 When the question was put to him whether the intervention was to be military, Sabahaddin’s response was ‘How many times have [the great powers] intervened in our domestic affairs, how many times even have parts of our country been taken away? Why do we not want to