Given the significant similarities and differences between the welfare states of Northern Europe and their reactions to the perceived 'refugee crisis' of 2015, the book focuses primarily on the three main cases of Denmark, Sweden and Germany. Placed in a wider Northern European context – and illustrated by those chapters that also discuss refugee experiences in Norway and the UK – the Danish, Swedish and German cases are the largest case studies of this edited volume. Thus, the book contributes to debates on the governance of non-citizens and the meaning of displacement, mobility and seeking asylum by providing interdisciplinary analyses of a largely overlooked region of the world, with two specific aims. First, we scrutinize the construction of the 2015 crisis as a response to the large influx of refugees, paying particular attention to the disciplinary discourses and bureaucratic structures that are associated with it. Second, we investigate refugees’ encounters with these bureaucratic structures and consider how these encounters shape hopes for building a new life after displacement. This allows us to show that the mobility of specific segments of the world’s population continues to be seen as a threat and a risk that has to be governed and controlled. Focusing on the Northern European context, our volume interrogates emerging policies and discourses as well as the lived experiences of bureaucratization from the perspective of individuals who find themselves the very objects of bureaucracies.
Bordering intimacy is a study of how borders and dominant forms of intimacy, such as family, are central to the governance of postcolonial states such as Britain. The book explores the connected history between contemporary border regimes and the policing of family with the role of borders under European and British empires. Building upon postcolonial, decolonial and black feminist theory, the investigation centres on how colonial bordering is remade in contemporary Britain through appeals to protect, sustain and make family life. Not only was family central to the making of colonial racism but claims to family continue to remake, shore up but also hide the organisation of racialised violence in liberal states. Drawing on historical investigations, the book investigates the continuity of colonial rule in numerous areas of contemporary government – family visa regimes, the policing of sham marriages, counterterror strategies, deprivation of citizenship, policing tactics, integration policy. In doing this, the book re-theorises how we think of the connection between liberal government, race, family, borders and empire. In using Britain as a case, this opens up further insights into the international/global circulations of liberal empire and its relationship to violence.
Institutions and the challenges of refugee governance
: What We
Know, Don’t Know and Need to Know. Centre on Migration, Policy and Society
Working Paper Series. Oxford: University of Oxford.
d’Haenens, L. and de Lange, M. (2001). ‘Framing of Asylum Seekers in Dutch
Regional Newspapers’, Media, Culture and Society 23(6), pp. 847–860.
Dagens Nyheter (2015a). Facket har också ansvar (The Labour Unions also have a
Responsibility), Dagens Nyheter, 12 October, p. 4.
Dagens Nyheter (2015b). Gränser handlar om annat än nationstillhörighet (Borders
Are About Something Other Than National Belonging), Dagens Nyheter, 11
Israeli security experience as an international brand
‘Communicating the Terrorist Risk: Harnessing a Culture of
Fear?’, Crime, Media, Culture 2(2): 123–42.
Neocleous, M., 2007.
‘Security, Commodity, Fetishism’, Critique 35(3):
Ochs, J., 2011. Security and
Suspicion: An Ethnography of Everyday Life in Israel , Philadelphia,
PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Pine, B. J. and J. H. Gilmore
How African-Americans shape their collective identity through consumption
Virág Molnár and Michèle Lamont
, Boston MA, Beacon Press.
Fisher, C. (1996), ‘Black, hip, and primed (to shop)’, American Demographics,
Fiske, J. (1994), ‘Radical shopping in Los Angeles: race, media and the sphere of consumption’, Media, Culture and Society, 16, pp. 469–86.
Fix, M., and Struyk, R. J. (1993), Clear and Convincing Evidence: measurement of
Innovation by demand
discrimination in America, Washington DC, Urban Institute Press.
Frazier, E. F. (1957), Black Bourgeoisie, New York, Free Press (reprinted 1997).
Gans, H. (1975), Popular Culture and High Culture: an analysis of