Given the significant similarities and differences between the welfare states of Northern Europe and their reactions to the perceived 'refugee crisis' of 2015, the book focuses primarily on the three main cases of Denmark, Sweden and Germany. Placed in a wider Northern European context – and illustrated by those chapters that also discuss refugee experiences in Norway and the UK – the Danish, Swedish and German cases are the largest case studies of this edited volume. Thus, the book contributes to debates on the governance of non-citizens and the meaning of displacement, mobility and seeking asylum by providing interdisciplinary analyses of a largely overlooked region of the world, with two specific aims. First, we scrutinize the construction of the 2015 crisis as a response to the large influx of refugees, paying particular attention to the disciplinary discourses and bureaucratic structures that are associated with it. Second, we investigate refugees’ encounters with these bureaucratic structures and consider how these encounters shape hopes for building a new life after displacement. This allows us to show that the mobility of specific segments of the world’s population continues to be seen as a threat and a risk that has to be governed and controlled. Focusing on the Northern European context, our volume interrogates emerging policies and discourses as well as the lived experiences of bureaucratization from the perspective of individuals who find themselves the very objects of bureaucracies.

Alexis Heraclides and Ada Dialla

. Bagnoli, ‘Humanitarian Intervention as a Perfect Duty: A Kantian Argument’, Nomos , 47 (2004), 1–29; S. M. Shell, ‘Kant on Just War and “Unjust Enemies”: Reflections on a “Pleonasm”’, Kantian Review , 10 (2005), 82–111; A. R. Bernstein, ‘Kant on Rights and Coercion in International Law: Implications for Humanitarian Intervention’, Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik/Annual Review of Law and Ethics , 16 (2008), 57

in Humanitarian intervention in the long nineteenth century
French denaturalisation law on the brink of World War II
Marie Beauchamps

., 1997. ‘The Camp as the Nomos of the Modern’, in H. De Vries and S. Weber, eds, Violence, Identity, and Self-Determination , Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Arendt, H., 1968. The Origins of Totalitarianism , New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Bal, M., 1999. ‘Introduction’, in M. Bal, J. V. Crewe, and L. Spitzer, eds, Acts of Memory

in Security/ Mobility
Martin Joormann

Evolution of the International Refugee Regime. International Journal of Refugee Law 14 (2&3), pp. 238–262. Boatcă, M. (2016). Globale Ungleichheiten und gekaufte Staatsbürgerschaft. Zum Mechanismus eines knappen Gutes (Global Inequalities and Purchased Citizenship: To the Mechanism of a Scarce Good). In Robertson von Trotha, C. (ed.), Die Zwischengesellschaft. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (1st ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Social class, economic capital and asylum systems 47 Canning

in Refugees and the violence of welfare bureaucracies in Northern Europe
Open Access (free)
Dalia Abdelhady, Nina Gren, and Martin Joormann

, Germany: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft. Duran, E. (2006). Healing the Soul Wound: Counseling with American Indians and Other Native People. New York: Teachers College Press. Dwyer, P. and Nettelbeck. A. (eds.) (2018). Violence, Colonialism and Empire in the Modern World. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Eldridge, E. R. and Reinke, A. J. (2018). ‘Introduction: Ethnographic Engagement with Bureaucratic Violence’, Conflict and Society, 4, pp. 94–99. Evans, I. (1997) Bureaucracy and Race: Native Administration in South Africa, Berkeley: University of California Press. Faist, T

in Refugees and the violence of welfare bureaucracies in Northern Europe