Search results
over justice: developing a framework for UN peacekeeping operations in internal conflicts’, Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations , 5:1 (Jan–Mar 1999 ), 63; and A. C. Arend and R. J. Beck, ‘International law and the recourse to force: a shift in paradigms’, in C. Ku and P. F. Diehl, International Law: Classic and Contemporary
norm exists, which member states codified in the United Nations Charter, which obligates states to resolve all disputes peacefully. While wars do occur, states are usually hesitant to challenge this principle of international law. In addition, waging war is a complicated prospect. If an upstream state builds a disputed dam, then a more powerful downstream state has a tactical target. Capturing a source
, 17 July 2000, 3). 41 Shuval, 2000 : 44–5. 42 See also Elmusa, 1994 for a discussion of applying international law to the negotiation of equitable sharing of water. 43 Ha
, Limor. ( 2000 ), ‘ No Security, No Peace ’, New York Times , 12 July, A21 . Lustick , Ian S. ( 1997a ), ‘ Ending Protracted Conflicts: The Oslo Peace Process Between Political Partnership and Legality ’, Cornell International Law Journal , 30 : 3 . Lustick , Ian S. ( 1997b
tradition of international ethics: see D. V. Jones, ‘The declaratory tradition in modern international law’, in T. Nardin and D. R. Mapel (eds), Traditions of International Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992 ), pp. 42–61. 28 So far, there have been three amendments to the
, conscience, religion or belief; 8. Equal rights and self-determination of peoples; 9. Cooperation among States; 10. Fulfilment in good faith of obligations under international law. 71 His following statement is a case in point: ‘We have reaffirmed America’s commitment to human rights as a fundamental tenet