Marie-Luce Desgrandchamps, Lasse Heerten, Arua Oko Omaka, Kevin O'Sullivan, and Bertrand Taithe
crisis was framed very much in terms of (anti-)colonialism. Irish missionaries, in
particular, liked to frame what was happening to the Biafrans as akin to what the
Irish had experienced in the BritishEmpire. The spectre of famine was particularly
significant in this respect. The phrase ‘The Great Hunger’ –
which had been popularised as the title of Cecil Woodham-Smith’s hugely
successful 1962 book – was used repeatedly by Irish missionaries and NGOs in
relation to Biafra
Through a study of the British Empire's largest women's patriotic organisation, formed in 1900 and still in existence, this book examines the relationship between female imperialism and national identity. It throws light on women's involvement in imperialism; on the history of ‘conservative’ women's organisations; on women's interventions in debates concerning citizenship and national identity; and on the history of women in white settler societies. After placing the Imperial Order Daughters of the Empire (IODE) in the context of recent scholarly work in Canadian, gender and imperial history, and post-colonial theory, the book follows the IODE's history through the twentieth century. Chapters focus upon the IODE's attempts to create a British Canada through its maternal feminist work in education, health, welfare and citizenship. In addition, the book reflects on the IODE's responses to threats to Anglo-Canadian hegemony posed by immigration, World Wars and Communism, and examines the complex relationship between imperial loyalty and settler nationalism. Tracing the organisation into the postcolonial era, where previous imperial ideas are outmoded, it considers the transformation from patriotism to charity, and the turn to colonisation at home in the Canadian North.
Royal Tourists, Colonial Subjects, and the Making of a British World, 1860-1911 examines the ritual space of nineteenth-century royal tours of empire and the diverse array of historical actors who participated in them. The book is a tale of royals who were ambivalent and bored partners in the project of empire; colonial administrators who used royal ceremonies to pursue a multiplicity of projects and interests or to imagine themselves as African chiefs or heirs to the Mughal emperors; local princes and chiefs who were bullied and bruised by the politics of the royal tour, even as some of them used the tour to symbolically appropriate or resist British cultural power; and settlers of European descent and people of colour in the empire who made claims on the rights and responsibilities of imperial citizenship and as co-owners of Britain’s global empire. Royal Tourists, Colonial Subjects, and the Making of a British World suggests that the diverse responses to the royal tours of the nineteenth century demonstrate how a multi-centred British-imperial culture was forged in the empire and was constantly made and remade, appropriated and contested. In this context, subjects of empire provincialized the British Isles, centring the colonies in their political and cultural constructions of empire, Britishness, citizenship, and loyalty.
it survives to this day. How did London shift from being
identified with the exalted Rome to being the disdained Carthage?
Gerwin Strobl’s study of the German perception of British foreign policy and
the BritishEmpire during the Weimar Republic (1918–1933) and the Third Reich
(1933–1945) suggests that widespread admiration for both existed among the German population, particularly among scholars of English language and culture.
Britain was seen as a nation that was both culturally and racially close to, and yet
more successful than, Germany. Nazi leaders
Julie Evans, Patricia Grimshaw, David Philips, and Shurlee Swain
interests and fortunes of those of
our fellow-subjects who have not yet attained, and some of whom may
never attain, to the full estate of self-government’. 5 Fisher congratulated
the mother country on the first of these points when he said: ‘The
BritishEmpire alone had been able to develop self-governing
institutions which were associated by almost unseen, but none the less
real, ties of loyalty with the
Bordering intimacy is a study of how borders and dominant forms of intimacy, such as family, are central to the governance of postcolonial states such as Britain. The book explores the connected history between contemporary border regimes and the policing of family with the role of borders under European and British empires. Building upon postcolonial, decolonial and black feminist theory, the investigation centres on how colonial bordering is remade in contemporary Britain through appeals to protect, sustain and make family life. Not only was family central to the making of colonial racism but claims to family continue to remake, shore up but also hide the organisation of racialised violence in liberal states. Drawing on historical investigations, the book investigates the continuity of colonial rule in numerous areas of contemporary government – family visa regimes, the policing of sham marriages, counterterror strategies, deprivation of citizenship, policing tactics, integration policy. In doing this, the book re-theorises how we think of the connection between liberal government, race, family, borders and empire. In using Britain as a case, this opens up further insights into the international/global circulations of liberal empire and its relationship to violence.
power – a power that was ‘dissipated by daily familiar
intercourses at Earl’s Court’ (Shepard 1986: 101). The fear was that if
such unions were given the blessing of the church and state in the
metropole, this promised to weaken the racialised-sexualised power of
colonial administration, and weaken violent practices that apparently
held native passions at bay all over the BritishEmpire.
In this context, we need to consider how the arrival of ‘savages’ in
London was constituted as a problem of movement across empire – how
the movement of certain racialised bodies to
Disease, conflict and nursing in the British Empire, 1880–1914
Imperial sisters in Hong Kong:
disease, conflict and nursing in the
British nurses, much like those enlisted in the colonial or military
services, frequently circulated within the Empire as a professional
necessity, often in response to the development of perceived crisis
in the form of conflicts or disease outbreaks, prompting reciprocally
shaping encounters between individuals within the various colonial
outposts. More traditional approaches to the history of nursing are
enclavist in the sense that they have
Better ‘the Hottentot at the hustings’ than ‘the Hottentot in the wilds with his gun on his shoulder’
Julie Evans, Patricia Grimshaw, David Philips, and Shurlee Swain
settlers. They had not been prepared to do so, however, while the Cape
remained a slave-owning society. The British Parliament had abolished
slavery throughout the BritishEmpire in 1833; this had taken effect in
the Cape in December 1834 – but the slaves had to continue to
serve their masters as ‘apprentices’ for another four years,
which meant that legal slavery did not fully end in the Cape until
Cancer, modernity, and decline in fin-de-siècle Britain
, less decadent diet was likely to protect against the disease.
Cancer – then as now – was conceptualised as a disease of civilisation, an unintended consequence of progress. Anxiety over the perceived increase of cancer was provoked in part by research that seemed to suggest the epidemic was not confined to Western or so-called ‘developed’ nations. Doctors across the BritishEmpire were, at the end of the nineteenth century, engaged in a large-scale evidence-gathering mission. Data and anecdotal evidence was