The interest in aesthetics in philosophy, literary and cultural studies is growing rapidly. This book contains exemplary essays by key practitioners in these fields which demonstrate the importance of this area of enquiry. New aestheticism remains a troubled term and in current parlance it already comes loaded with the baggage of the 'philistine controversy' which first emerged in an exchange that originally that took place in the New Left Review during the mid-1990s. A serious aesthetic education is necessary for resisting the advance of 'philistinism'. Contemporary aesthetic production may be decentred and belonging to the past, but that is not a reason to underestimate what great works do that nothing else can. Despite well-established feminist work in literary criticism, film theory and art history, feminist aesthetics 'is a relatively young discipline, dating from the early 1990s'. The book focuses on the critical interrogation of the historical status of mimesis in the context of a gendered and racial politics of modernity. Throughout the history of literary and art criticism the focus has fallen on the creation or reception of works and texts. The book also identifies a fragmentary Romantic residue in contemporary aesthetics. The Alexandrian aesthetic underlies the experience of the 'allegorical'. 'Cultural poetics' makes clear the expansion of 'poetics' into a domain that is no longer strictly associated with 'poetry'. The book also presents an account of a Kantian aesthetic criticism, discussing Critique of Pure Reason, Critique of Aesthetic Judgement and Critique of Judgement.
), ‘ Third
World Industrialization: “Global Fordism” or a New
Model? ’, NewLeftReview , 182 ,
5 – 31 . Anderson ,
C. ( 2007 ),
‘ The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method
Obsolete ’, Wired , 16 July ,
(accessed 9 February
2015 ). Bauman ,
Z. ( 2000 ), Liquid
Modernity ( Cambridge : Polity
Press ). Becker , K.
F. ( 2004 ), The Informal
Economy: Fact Finding Study ( Stockholm :
– contribution to this undertaking focused on a particular account of the
character of British reformism. Two of Nairn’s publications stand out as especially
relevant in this regard. First, in ‘The nature of the Labour Party’, a paper in two
parts originally published in NewLeftReview during 1964 and subsequently
merged as a chapter of Anderson and Blackburn’s Towards Socialism (1965), he
gave a coruscating overview of the party’s failures during the first sixty years of its
history. In passing, the reader should note that although these publications are
cited by their
Six Countries (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999);
S. Keenan, ‘Force of habit’, Red Pepper, 86 (August 2001), p. 6.
6 T. Nairn, ‘Farewell Britannia’, NewLeftReview, 2:7 (2001), pp. 55–74.
7 McGarry, ‘Northern Ireland, civic nationalism and the Good Friday Agreement’; B. O’Leary, ‘The nature of the British–Irish Agreement’, NewLeftReview, 233 (1999), pp. 66–96.
8 O’Leary, ‘The nature of the British–Irish Agreement’.
9 Nairn, ‘Farewell Britannia’.
10 P. Stewart and P. Shirlow, ‘Northern Ireland: between war and peace?’,
Capital and Class, 69 (1999), pp
the pages of the NewLeftReview (NLR) or The Socialist Register. Though
the nuances of interpretation varied among these individuals, the use of the term
‘labourism’ to denote the limitations placed upon the party by its particular history, ideology and structure, and above all, what Miliband (1972: 13) called its
‘devotion to the parliamentary system’ was a common feature.
This was not, in itself, a wholly new way of looking at Labour. New Left critiques
of labourism in fact represented and continued a strand of Marxist thinking on the
party that can be traced
of Thompson joined up with the
Universities and Left Review to establish the NewLeftReview, a journal which, for all
its intellectual merits, never exerted much influence on Labour politics.
Miliband still remained optimistic that Labour would take a decisive turn to the
Left as he wrote Parliamentary Socialism. It was in 1960 that Gaitskell’s attempt to
reduce the doctrinal significance of the party’s commitment to public ownership
suffered a decisive set-back. That year also saw him defeated at conference over
unilateral nuclear disarmament. While Gaitskell
Socialist Register 1997
Albo, G. Langille, D and Panitch, L. (eds) (1993) A Different Kind of State: Popular Power and
Democratic Administration, Toronto
Brivati, B. and Heffernan, R. (eds) (2000) The Labour Party: A Centenary History
Burden, T., Breitenbach, H. and Coates, D. (1990) Features of a Viable Socialism
Coates, D. (1975) The Labour Party and the Struggle for Socialism, Cambridge
Coates, D. (1980) Labour in Power? A Study of the Labour Government 1974–79
Coates, D. (1981) ‘The Labour Left and the transition to socialism’, NewLeftReview, 129
Coates, D. (1982
initial impact of theory, but also conceptually in
the sense that as ‘theory’ now enters a more reflective phase, there is an increased willingness among cultural theorists and philosophers alike to consider ‘the philosophical origins of literary theory’.
Yet, in this respect, new aestheticism remains a troubled term and in current parlance it already comes loaded with the baggage of the ‘philistine controversy’ which
first emerged in an exchange that originally that took place in the NewLeftReview
during the mid-1990s. New aestheticism was identified there as a
Class cultures, the trade unions and the Labour Party
signposts for others to follow in search of answers.
Unless indicated, the place of publication is London.
Anderson, P. (1964) ‘Origins of the present crisis’, NewLeftReview, 23.
Berger, S. (1994) The British Labour Party and the German Social Democrats, Oxford
Berger, S. and Boughton, D. (eds) (1995) The Force of Labour: The Western European Labour
Movement and the Working Class in the Twentieth Century, Oxford
Geary, D. (ed.) (1989) Labour and Socialist Movements in Europe Before 1914, Oxford
McKibbin, R. (1974) The Evolution of the Labour Party, Oxford
Class polarisation and neo-liberalism in the Irish Republic
Source: R. Brenner, ‘The economics of global turbulence’, special issue of NewLeftReview, May–June 1998, p. 235.
The problem with this whole approach is that it focuses on secondary
features of regions of the global economy to claim the existence of radically
different models of capitalism. It fails to look at the underlying dynamic
of the wider system of late capitalism and, therefore, is unable to distinguish between different