This book is a history of an illusion. It is also a history of the dream that preceded the illusion. The book discusses statistics as the field of tension between the scientific claims of neutrality and universality on the one hand and the political and economic reality of the conflicting interests of nation-states on the other. The various paths of state- and nation-building that European countries traversed in the nineteenth century are recognisable in the objectives of government statistics and are reflected in the topics selected for statistical study and in the categories used in the research. Each congress was clearly dominated by the specific interests of the country in which the statisticians convened. The book shows in each case how the organisation of government statistics and national concerns influenced the international agenda. It describes the perceptions, goals and dilemmas of the protagonists and their contact with each other, and in so doing unravels the complex relationships between science, government and society, wherever possible from their point of view. The genesis of international statistics was inspired by a desire for reform. Belgium's pioneering role in the European statistical movement was informed both by its liberal polity and the special status of statistics within it, and by Adolphe Quetelet's key position as an intellectual. The consolidation of the Grand Duchy of Baden, a new medium-sized state in the Rhine Confederation and later in the German Confederation, offered great opportunities for the development of official statistics.
This book is an attempt at a comprehensive presentation of the history of humanitarian intervention in the long nineteenth century, the heyday of this controversial doctrine. It starts with a brief presentation of the present situation and debate. The theoretical first part of the book starts with the genealogy of the idea, namely the quest for the progenitors of the idea in the sixteenth and seventeenth century which is a matter of controversy. Next the nineteenth century ‘civilization-barbarity’ dichotomy is covered and its bearing on humanitarian intervention, with its concomitant Eurocentric/Orientalist gaze towards the Ottomans and other states, concluding with the reaction of the Ottomans (as well as the Chinese and Japanese). Then the pivotal international law dimension is scrutinized, with the arguments of advocates and opponents of humanitarian intervention from the 1830s until the 1930s. The theoretical part of the book concludes with nineteenth century international political theory and intervention (Kant, Hegel, Cobden, Mazzini and especially J.S. Mill). In the practical second part of the book four cases studies of humanitarian intervention are examined in considerable detail: the Greek case (1821-1831), the Lebanon/Syria case (1860-61), the Balkan crisis and Bulgarian case (1875-78) in two chapters, and the U.S. intervention in Cuba (1895-98). Each cases study concludes with its bearing on the evolution of international norms and rules of conduct in instances of humanitarian plights. The concluding chapter identifies the main characteristics of intervention on humanitarian grounds during this period and today’s criticism and counter-criticism.
Engine of Modernity: The Omnibus and Urban Culture in Nineteenth-Century Paris examines the connection between public transportation and popular culture in nineteenth-century Paris through a focus on the omnibus - a horse-drawn vehicle for mass urban transport which enabled contact across lines of class and gender. A major advancement in urban locomotion, the omnibus generated innovations in social practices by compelling passengers of diverse backgrounds to interact within the vehicle’s close confines. Although the omnibus itself did not actually have an engine, its arrival on the streets of Paris and in the pages of popular literature acted as a motor for a fundamental cultural shift in how people thought about the city, its social life, and its artistic representations. At the intersection of literary criticism and cultural history, Engine of Modernity argues that for nineteenth-century French writers and artists, the omnibus was much more than a mode of transportation. It became a metaphor through which to explore evolving social dynamics of class and gender, meditate on the meaning of progress and change, and reflect on one’s own literary and artistic practices.
jurisdiction in Germany as a case study to explain how professional accountability changed during the nineteenthcentury. It examines the transformation that occurred in medical jurisdiction, in order to discuss how doctors were held responsible for professional malpractice and how legal procedures changed. The transformation of medical jurisdiction is understood as the result of changing patterns of accountability in more general terms. The French sociologist François Ewald sees a shift in accountability in the workplace, from the idea of individual liability to the
Paris exposition. The siege came to an end when the French breached
the Malakoff bastion on 8 September, two days before the opening of the second
international statistical congress.
The congress delegates were not especially concerned with the Crimean
War. Nevertheless, Carl Friedrich Wilhelm Dieterici, who represented the
States and statistics in the nineteenthcentury
Prussian kingdom in 1855 as he had in 1853, observed a bellicose mood among
the French.1 The name of General Pélissier, the hero of the storming of the
The German phoenix: Berlin 1863
erlin underwent a period of prodigious growth in the mid-nineteenthcentury. Between 1850 and 1870 its population doubled from approximately
400,000 to 800,000, making it the largest city in German-speaking Europe,
larger even than Vienna. In just a few decades the city had shed its provincial
image and was able to compete with metropolises like London and Paris on
the strength of its economic, cultural and scientific credentials. In 1871 Berlin
would become the proud capital city of the new German Empire.
In the nineteenthcentury, the idea of
European cultural and moral superiority was at its peak, with a presumed historical
mission to civilize the rest of the world by expanding European influence and by
colonization. 1 At the level of the
selfdefined Eurocentric international society and law, countries and peoples were
distinguished as either ‘civilized’ or ‘uncivilized’
(‘barbarians’), with Europe the basis of comparison, in
face the ‘spectre of Austin’, 2 who dominated British jurisprudence in the first part of the
nineteenthcentury. For John Austin, ‘laws properly so called’ were
‘established directly by command’ 3 and those lacking command were ‘positive moral rules
which are laws improperly so called … laws set or imposed by
general opinion ’ 4 and this
was the case with the ‘so called law of nations [which]
consists of opinions or sentiments current among nations generally’. 5
The second intervention in the nineteenthcentury on humanitarian grounds is regarded the great power intervention in Lebanon
and Syria, headed by France. 1 Both were
at the time provinces of Greater Syria, within the Ottoman Empire, which included
today’s Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Israel, the West Bank and Gaza.
When the intervention in Lebanon and Syria took place in
1860–61, the debate among publicists on humanitarian
Among the handful of humanitarian
interventions of the nineteenthcentury the intervention in Cuba is the most
controversial, in view of the US reluctance to leave Cuba and the huge advantages it
accrued, including the acquisition of even the faraway Philippines.
Any discussion of the US stance on intervention before 1914 has to
take into consideration the Monroe Doctrine of 1823. 1 The Doctrine contained three principles: (1