Stories from the frontline of the NHS

Healthcare aims to be patient-centred but a large gap remains between the fine words and the reality. Care often feels designed for the convenience of the organisations that deliver it, and not enough around patients and their families, or even around the frontline staff who provide it. Why does this happen? What does it feel like? What can be done about it? This book stimulates reflection on these questions by listening closely to those at the frontline. It provides accounts from patients, carers and healthcare professionals who are patients about what it’s like when services get it right, and wrong, from birth up to the end of life. Quite simply, we want to draw upon the power of storytelling – which is increasingly valued as a tool for learning – to help policymakers and practitioners to understand how to deliver better care. We also hope to enlighten the general reader about how they might go about navigating “the system” while it remains imperfect. There is a growing literature of first-person accounts from patients and from healthcare professionals. This book differs by providing a collection of narratives of experiences of the NHS in England to paint a rich and varied picture. Alongside these narratives we provide some international context, and an overview of the history of moves towards a more patient-centred approach to care. We present the theory and practice of storytelling in the context of healthcare. We also seek to help the reader to draw out the practical learning from the individual accounts.

This handbook is written for patients and members of the public who want to understand more about the approaches, methods and language used by health-services researchers. Patient and public involvement (PPI) in research is now a requirement of most major health-research programmes, and this book is designed to equip these individuals with the knowledge and skills necessary for meaningful participation. Edited by award-winning mental-health researchers, the book has been produced in partnership with mental-health-service users and carers with experience of research involvement. It includes personal reflections from these individuals alongside detailed information on quantitative, qualitative and health-economics research methods, and comprehensively covers all the basics needed for large-scale health research projects: systematic reviews; research design and analysis using both qualitative and quantitative approaches; health economics; research ethics; impact and dissemination. This book was developed during a five-year research programme funded by the UK’s National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) called Enhancing the Quality of User Involved Care Planning in Mental Health Services (EQUIP). The handbook clearly outlines research practices, and gives an insight into how public and patient representatives can be involved in them and shape decisions. Each chapter ends with a reflective exercise, and there are also some suggested sources of additional reading. People who get involved in health research as experts from experience now have a textbook to support their research involvement journey.

Andrew C. Grundy

A Research Handbook for Patient and Public Involvement Researchers Chapter 1: Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) and the research process Andrew C Grundy Chapter overview This chapter defines and introduces the different stages of the research process: from identifying a problem, to reviewing the literature; then developing a research question; designing a study; obtaining funding and ethical approval; recruiting participants; collecting and analysing data; and reporting and disseminating findings. This chapter will outline how users of health services, their

in A research handbook for patient and public involvement researchers
A Realistic Ambition?
Pierre Mendiharat, Elba Rahmouni, and Léon Salumu

nearly all the places where MSF was already working. Without any treatments, caring for those patients was impossible and end-of-life support very difficult. Patients were highly stigmatised, even by some in the medical profession. There was an internal debate at the organisation about whether it was pertinent for MSF to do prevention projects; because there was no vaccine, prevention was based solely on behavioural changes like condom use and abstinence. In

Journal of Humanitarian Affairs
Building High-tech Castles in the Air?
Anisa Jabeen Nasir Jafar

support such a system. Instead of a top-down approach to this, we need to look from the bottom up. What is the field hospital capable of doing? How does documentation fit in with patient flow? What is the essential information and what is superfluous information? Who needs access to which aspects of the patient documentation? Once we have established these aspects, we must start with the humble pen and paper and watch the process carefully, identifying points at which technology would be acceptable

Journal of Humanitarian Affairs
Positioning, Politics and Pertinence
Natalie Roberts

former president of MSF, observed that the organisation would have to decide whether it prioritised ‘treating the epidemic, or the patients of the epidemic’ (Brauman in Losson, 2015 ). Yet despite calls by another former MSF president, Jean-Hervé Bradol, to open a debate around some of MSF’s operational choices in West Africa ( Bradol, 2016 ), few efforts were made to continue the discussion. The MSF International President, Joanne Liu, who had privately

Journal of Humanitarian Affairs
Lessons Learned from an Intervention by Médecins Sans Frontières
Maria Ximena Di Lollo, Elena Estrada Cocina, Francisco De Bartolome Gisbert, Raquel González Juarez, and Ana Garcia Mingo

unthinkable in a European country with a robust healthcare system. In this article, we reflect on our experience and some of the lessons that can be learned for future epidemics. Evolution of MSF Intervention In March 2020, there was a steep increase in critical COVID-19 patients leading to a shortfall in hospital beds, including beds in intensive care units and for those patients needing access to respiratory support. Supporting emergency response is

Journal of Humanitarian Affairs
Open Access (free)
Planned Obsolescence of Medical Humanitarian Missions: An Interview with Tony Redmond, Professor and Practitioner of International Emergency Medicine and Co-founder of HCRI and UK-Med

and more regulated, more and more accountable, and in a humanitarian setting you hear people saying, ‘I just want to go and treat patients in need’ – OK, but if you have to be accountable in this country, you have to be accountable everywhere, full stop. And I think that’s a problem. You might just think it’s semantics, but I don’t think you should ever alter the standard of care that you deliver; I think you should always give the highest standard of care

Journal of Humanitarian Affairs
Open Access (free)
Lachlan McIver, Maria Guevara, and Gabriel Alcoba

medication to treat visceral leishmaniasis, an NTD that is among the top three parasitic diseases (after malaria and schistosomiasis) in terms of global morbidity and mortality ( WHO, 2021c ) – was declared. Its main manufacturer, Gilead, had agreed with the Indian Ministry of Health to reorient supplies to treat mucormycosis, a rare fungal infection appearing in COVID-19 patients being treated with immunosuppressive drugs such as steroids ( Singh et al. , 2021 ). That same month

Journal of Humanitarian Affairs
Open Access (free)
Interpreting Violence on Healthcare in the Early Stage of the South Sudanese Civil War
Xavier Crombé and Joanna Kuper

had treated many wounded patients, most of them civilians, including women and children. Not only were civilians the prime targets of violence, the authors of the report asserted, but ‘healthcare itself’ had been ‘under attack’: in August 2011, only a few weeks after the independence ceremony, an MSF-run health facility in Pieri had been looted and burnt down; over the year that followed, armed groups had again ransacked, damaged or destroyed three more health structures

Journal of Humanitarian Affairs