This book reviews a variety of approaches to the study of the European Union's foreign policy. Much analysis of EU foreign policy contains theoretical assumptions about the nature of the EU and its member states, their inter-relationships, the international system in which they operate and the nature of European integration. The book outlines the possibilities for the use of discourse analysis in the study of European foreign policy. It sets out to explore the research problem using a political-cultural approach and seeks to illuminate the cognitive mind-maps with which policy-makers interpret their political 'realities'. The book provides an overview and analysis of some of the non-realist approaches to international relations and foreign policy, and proposes an analytical framework with which to explore the complex interplay of factors affecting European foreign policy. The book suggests one way of seeking theoretical parsimony without sacriﬁcing the most deﬁning empirical knowledge which has been generated about Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) over the years. It argues that while the sui generis nature of CFSP presents an acute problem for international relations theory, it is less pronounced with regard to traditional integration theory. The book discusses the dimensions of European foreign policy-making with reference to the case of arms export controls. Situated at the interface between European studies and international relations, it outlines how the EU relates to the rest of the world, explaining its effort towards creating a credible, effective and principled foreign, security and defence policy.
The substantive and methodological contributions of professional historians to development policy debates was marginal, whether because of the dominance of economists or the inability of historians to contribute. There are broadly three ways in which history matters for development policy. These include insistence on the methodological principles of respect for context, process and difference; history is a resource of critical and reflective self-awareness about the nature of the discipline of development itself; and history brings a particular kind of perspective to development problems . After establishing the key issues, this book explores the broad theme of the institutional origins of economic development, focusing on the cases of nineteenth-century India and Africa. It demonstrates that scholarship on the origins of industrialisation in England in the late eighteenth century suggests a gestation reaching back to a period during which a series of social institutional innovations were pioneered and extended to most citizens of England. The book examines a paradox in China where an emphasis on human welfare characterized the rule of the eighteenth-century Qing dynasty, and has been demonstrated in modern-day China's emphasis on health and education. It provides a discussion on the history of the relationship between ideology and policy in public health, sanitation in India's modern history and the poor health of Native Americans. The book unpacks the origins of public education, with a focus on the emergency of mass literacy in Victorian England and excavates the processes by which colonial education was indigenized throughout South-East Asia.
The increasing commercialisation of sport raises important questions concerning regulation. The development of the European Union (EU) and the internationalization of sporting competition have added an international dimension to this debate. Yet sport is not only a business, it is a social and cultural activity. Can regulation at the EU level reconcile this tension? Adopting a distinctive legal and political analysis, this book argues that the EU is receptive to the claim of sport for special treatment before the law. It investigates the birth of EU sports law and policy by examining the impact of the Bosman ruling and other important European Court of Justice decisions, the relationship between sport and EU competition law, focusing particularly on the broadcasting of sport, the organization of sport and the international transfer system, and the relationship between sport and the EU Treaty, focusing in particular on the impact of the Amsterdam and Nice declarations on sport and the significance of the Helsinki report on sport. This text raises questions concerning the appropriate theoretical tools for analysing European integration.
This chapter addresses two key
objectives of this book identified in the introductory chapter. It makes a
case for a new theoretical approach to the study of the European Union as a
global actor based explicitly upon an adapted foreign policy analysis. It
also seeks to broaden the focus of the analysis from the Common Foreign and
Security Policy to the much more broadly based concept of European foreign
The foreign policy of the European Union
is in many ways a puzzle to students of international relations. Doubts
about whether there is in reality a European foreign policy contrast with
empirical observations of the considerable influence exerted by the EU, if
not always in the international system at large, then at least in Europe.
Such observations imply that the EU has a ‘foreign policy’ of
Between international relations and European studies
Ben Tonra and Thomas Christiansen
The European Union’s foreign
policy is an ongoing puzzle. The membership of the enlarging European Union
has set itself ever more ambitious goals in the field of foreign
policy-making, yet at the same time each member state continues to guard its
ability to conduct an independent foreign policy. As far as the EU’s
ambitions are concerned, foreign policy cooperation led to coordination, and
The sports policy subsystem
Sabatier’s Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) proves a useful starting
point for those wishing to conceptualise the EU as comprising a myriad of
policy subsystems. Operating within these subsystems is a wide range of
actors who attempt to steer policy in a direction compatible with their belief
system. Sabatier’s broad concept of subsystem actors stresses the political
nature of subsystem activity. Sabatier defines a policy subsystem as a ‘set of
actors who are involved in dealing with a policy problem’ (Sabatier 1988:
Launched in 1970, Europe’s common
foreign policy has, to some degree, come of age. Because previous attempts
to introduce cooperation in the field of foreign policy had failed, the
cooperative enterprise was deliberately launched with very modest ambitions.
Its development over the years came to include still more policy areas, and
still more modules were added to its institutional infrastructure. When
The foreign policy process has become
Europeanised, in the sense that in every international issue, there
is an exchange of information and an attempt to arrive at a common
understanding and a common approach – compared to how things
were in the past, where most issues were looked at in isolation
without addressing the attitudes
This monograph seeks to examine the motivations for the European Union’s (EU) policy towards the Common Market of the South (Mercosur), the EU’s most important relationship with another regional economic integration organisation. This monograph argues that the dominant explanations in the literature -- balancing the US, global aspirations, being an external federator, long-standing economic and cultural ties, economic interdependence, and the Europeanization of Spanish and Portuguese national foreign policies – fail to adequately explain the EU’s policy. In particular, these accounts tend to infer the EU’s motives from its activity. Drawing extensive primary documents, this monograph argues that the major developments in the relationship -- the 1992 Inter-institutional Agreement and the 1995 Europe Mercosur Inter-regional Framework Cooperation Agreement – were initiated by Mercosur and supported mainly by Spain. This means that rather than the EU pursuing a strategy, as implied by most of the existing literature, the EU was largely responsive.