, track, quantify and monitor the physical bodies of populations affected
by disaster and conflict, although these populations have little say or control over
them ( Lupton, 2015 ). Humanitarian
technology has become a field of considerable scholarly interest, and this raises
many issues with respect to the ‘do no harm’ aspect of humanitarian
aid ( Sandvik et al. ,
2017 ), what it means to be neutral ( Sandvik et al. , 2014 ), the proper role and relevance
A Response to the Journal of Humanitarian Affairs Special Issue on Innovation in Humanitarian Action (JHA, 1:3)
humanitarian aid. (personal communication, 21 November, 2019)
The scale of unmet needs continues to grow, and money alone cannot address this gap; the humanitarian system urgently needs robust new solutions to make limited resources more effective ( Elrha, 2018c ). Sectors that invest consistently in research and development are proven to be more effective than those that don’t. Elrha believes the humanitarian sector is no different to others in this respect. However, spend on research and development here remains low. The best effort to quantify spending to
tool for analysis. Humanitarian data, which is subject to the obstacles of working within a repressive system where information and movement are controlled, gives an understanding of how agencies operating in the country quantify and define needs within the constrained environment.
Humanitarian documentation on the DPRK is not without its challenges – access has been a perennial issue, leading several NGOs to withdraw in the 1990s and 2000s. While restrictions remain and continue to be a major challenge, some indicators suggest aspects of access can and have
Matthew Hunt, Sharon O’Brien, Patrick Cadwell, and Dónal P. O’Mathúna
assessments are challenging because, for example, the impact of lacking
vaccinations is easier to quantify than the lack of information in specific
languages. To address such challenges, representatives from the affected
linguistic and cultural groups should be included in these discussions and their
concerns and proposals addressed in resulting guidelines and procedures.
Humanitarian organisations may need training to raise their awareness of the
on health care, quantifying their effect (in terms of damage to health
structure, staff, and lost services), convincing global actors of the urgent
need to enforce international protections for health care, and achieving
accountability for breaching them.’ ( 2017 : 2279)
Analysis (of both pattern and impact), advocacy and accountability all need to be
served by the data such mechanisms would generate. However laudable, the question
Lessons Learned for Engagement in Fragile and Conflict-Affected States
, sector (following the UN OCHA sector/cluster categorisation), and report type. The categorisation allowed for a basic landscape assessment by year and sector. For the synthesis of lessons learned, the reports were assessed qualitatively by sector. Content was coded as lessons learned, challenges, insights and positive practices. While NVivo (as do other content-coding software) allows for more systematic approaches (e.g. quantifying usage frequency of specific terms to indicate level of importance, or lack thereof; e.g. Cochrane et al. , 2017 ), this approach was not
Measuring difference, numbering normal provides a detailed study of the technological construction of disability by examining how the audiometer and spirometer were used to create numerical proxies for invisible and inarticulable experiences. Measurements, and their manipulation, have been underestimated as crucial historical forces motivating and guiding the way we think about disability. Using measurement technology as a lens, this book draws together several existing discussions on disability, healthcare, medical practice, embodiment and emerging medical and scientific technologies at the turn of the twentieth century. As such, this work connects several important and usually separate academic subject areas and historical specialisms. The standards embedded in instrumentation created strict but ultimately arbitrary thresholds of normalcy and abnormalcy. Considering these standards from a long historical perspective reveals how these dividing lines shifted when pushed. The central thesis of this book is that health measurements are given artificial authority if they are particularly amenable to calculability and easy measurement. These measurement processes were perpetuated and perfected in the interwar years in Britain as the previously invisible limits of the body were made visible and measurable. Determination to consider body processes as quantifiable was driven by the need to compensate for disability occasioned by warfare or industry. This focus thus draws attention to the biopower associated with systems, which has emerged as a central area of concern for modern healthcare in the second decade of the twenty-first century.
disability that have been contested, for instance in compensation procedures. Difficulties around diagnosis are compounded by invisible experiences, and so measurement tools are used to make the invisible visible. However, problems often coalesce around felt experiences that do not lend themselves to easy quantification. Dissonance between objective measurement and subjective experience is therefore a recurring theme, resounding in each chapter of this book. Measurement technologies were a crucial component of the drive to quantify bodily norms and grade sensorial symptoms
with each other to shape their experiences.
Given the fluid and variable nature of ‘disability’, it’s difficult to quantify the
number of ‘disabled’ people in nineteenth-century Britain. In coal, as in other
industries, these difficulties are compounded by a lack of reliable statistics
for accidents and occupational diseases for the period. As Chapter 1 shows,
although the growth of government regulation of mining after 1850 compelled
mine owners and managers to report ‘serious’ accidents, fatal accidents were
generally better reported than non
This chapters examines the attempts by psychiatrists and psychoanalysts to popularise their research by choosing to analyse cases—and thus the phenomenon of—creative genius. It shows how psychoanalysis and its proponents co-opted and adapted the medical case study as an extant and authoritative rhetorical form through which to forge a new mode of enquiry. The ways in which psychoanalysts such as Isidor Sadger sought to incorporate and adapt sexological pathographies into psychoanalytic thought, shaped the responses within the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society (WPV) and fuelled a debate that directly contributed to Freud’s development of psychoanalytic case writing. The decisive sophistication of this discourse can be appreciated in Sigmund Freud’s dialogic-psychoanalytic case studies, which show his keen appreciation of the bond that tied middle-class readers to revered creative artists. Yet Freud hesitated (or perhaps thought it fruitless) to challenge this reverence and left the complex quantification of results to his pupil Otto Rank.