Big science and small science
Reflections on the relationship between science and society from the perspective of physics
in The freedom of scientific research

Piccirillo moves from the premise that science, in any form and format, is a valuable enterprise. If this is accepted, then scientists should enjoy a substantial degree of freedom from various forms of restrictions. Financial restrictions obviously call into question wider issues about the morality of resource rationing. Other forms of restrictions, based on ignorance, fear or political or ideological credo, are harder to justify. Scientific freedom is not just a political or ideological matter. It is also a matter for scientists to actively deal with: it is the role of scientists to explain, in accessible terms, the importance of scientific endeavours that may appear either grand and remote, incomprehensible and detached from the life of many laypeople, or otherwise frivolous and trivial. Piccirillo takes on this role and discusses examples of seemingly grand and frivolous science, such as the Large Hadron Collider and the Markov chain, explains their purposes and importance and shows that there is a big added value to society from small and big science if they work together.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

The freedom of scientific research

Bridging the gap between science and society

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 35 35 4
PDF Downloads 48 48 2